Abstract
Two positions clash on the "nature" and the
"value" of contemporary art : one : non critical,
which accepts everything that claims to be 'art'
as actually being art, and the other, often
considered
"reactionary",
refusing
the
"anything goes". This article presents a third
position directly inspired by a new trend in
phenomenology represented notably by Marc
Richir. Wouldn’t the irreducibility of art -
anytime and anywhere - in contemporary art as
well, lie in a particular mobilization of
temporalization and spatialization processes of
the constitution of meaning and form that
contemporary art seems to have abandoned ?
References
Baudrillard, J. (1969). Le système des objets. Gallimard. Baudrillard, J. (1972). Pour une critique de l'économie politique du signe. Gallimard. Baudrillard, J. (s.f.). Entrevues à propos du "complot de l'art". Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Gallimard. Chalumeau. (s.f.). Où va l'art contemporain ? Duchamp, M. (s.f.). Duchamp du signe. Qu'est ce que l'art? Les réponses de la philosophie analytique. (2005, febrero). Art 21, 46-53. Stiegler, B. (1996). La technique et le temps (Tomo 2). Galilée. Virilio, P. (2001). Cybermonde la politique du pire. Textuel.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.