Résumé
En este trabajo analizo las pruebas que proponen
Cappelen y Lepore (2004) para identificar
sensibilidad semántica al contexto. Estas pruebas se
presentan como una forma de identificar la
proposición mínima y como contrapeso a los casos
de cambio de contexto y de compleción. En este
sentido, pretenden servir como una defensa al
PDCP. Esta pruebas, sin embargo, no dan cuenta de
expresiones que intuitivamente son sensibles al
contexto. De modo que aceptar sus pruebas son una
garantía para mantener que hay sensibilidad
pragmática al contexto.
Références
Bach, Kent, (1994), "Conversational Impliciture" en Mind and Language, (U. K. & USA,
Blackwell), Vol. 9
Bach, K. (1999), "The semantics Pragmatics distinction: What it is and Why it matters"
en Ken Turner (ed.), The semantics - pragmatics interface from different points of
view. (Oxford, Elsevier).
Bach, K. (2006ª), "The Excluded Middle: Semantic Minimalism without Minimal
Propositions". En Philosophy and Phenomenological Research symposium on
Insensitive Semantics.
Bach, K. (2006b), "Minimalism for Dummies: Reply to Cappelen and Lepore". En
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research symposium on Insensitive Semantics.
Bach, K. (2006c), "From the strange to the bizarre: Another reply to Cappelen and
Lepore". En Philosophy and Phenomenological Research commentary on Insensitive
Semantics.
Bezuidenhout, A. (2002), "Truth-Conditional Pragmatics". En Philosophical
Perspectives, No. 16.
Bezuidenhout, A. (2006), "The coherence of contextualism: A reply to Cappelen &
Lepore". En Mind & Language, No. 21.
Borg, E. (2004), Minimal Semantics. USA, Clarendon Press. Oxford University Press.
Borg, E. (2007), "Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics". En G. Preyer and
G. Peter (eds) Context Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: Essays on
Semantics and Pragmatics. (Oxford University Press).
Borg, E. (2009b) "Meaning and context: a survey of a contemporary debate". En D.
Whiting. ed. The Later Wittgenstein on Language. (Palgrave).
Borg, E. (2009c), "Semantic Minimalism". En L. Cummings (ed.) The Pragmatics
Encyclopedia. (Routledge).
Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. (2002), "Indexicality, Binding, Anaphora, and A Priori
Truth", en Analysis, Vol. 62.
Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore. (2003), “Context Shifting Arguments” en Philosophical
Perspectives, No. 17, Language and Philosophical Linguistics, (Blackwell).
Cappelen, H. and Ernie Lepore. (2005), Insensitive semantics. A defense of semantic
minimalism ans speech act pluralism. (USA, Blackwell).
Cappelen, H. and Ernie Lepore. (2005 a), "Radical and Moderate Pragmatics: Does
Meaning Determine Truth Conditions?" en Zoltán Gendler Szabó Semantics vs.
Pragmatics, (USA, Oxford University Press).
Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore, (2006) "Reply to Bach". En Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research commentary on Insensitive Semantics.
Carston, R. 1988 "Implicature, Explicature and Truth - Theoretic Semantics" en S.
Davis (ed.) Pragmatics, (Oxford University Press).
Carston, R. 1998 “Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature”. In Carston, R.,
Uchida, S. (Eds.). Relevance Threory: Applications and Implications ( pp.179-236).
(Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
Clapp, L. (2007), "Minimal (Disagreement about) Semantics" en Gerhard Preyer and
George Peter. Context - sensitivity and semantic minimalism. (USA - UK, Oxford
University Press).
Ezcurdia, M. (2002), "Indexicals and Demonstratives". En Encyclopaedia of Cognitive
Science, (Macmillan Publishing Co, London).
Ezcurdia, M. (2009), "Motivating Moderate Contextualism". En Manuscrito, Rev. Int.
Fil., (Campinas), Vol. 32, No. 1.
Grice, H. P. (1989 a) "Logic and Conversation". En Studies in the Way of Words.
(Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press).
Grice, H. P. (1989 b) "Meaning". En Studies in the Way of Words. (Cambridge, Mass:
Harvard University Press).
Grice, H. P. (1989 c) "Presupposition and Conversational Implicature". En Studies in
the Way of Words. (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press).
Kaplan, D. (1989), "Demonstratives". En Almong, J., Perry, J., y Wettstein, H. (eds)
Themes from Kaplan. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
King, Jeffrey y Jason Stanley, (2005), "Semantics, Pragmatics, and the Role of
Semantic Content" en Zoltán Gendler Szabó Semantics vs. Pragmatics, (USA,
Oxford University Press).
Perry, J. (1998), “Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents”, Proceedings
of
the 1995 CSLI-Armsterdam Logic, Language and Computation Conference, (CSLI
Publications, Stanford).
Recanati, F. (1995) ‘The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation’. En Cognitive Science
No.19: 207-32.
Recanati, F. (2005), "Literalism and contextualism: Some varieties" en Preyer, G. Y
Peter. P. Conteextualism in Philosophy: knowledge, meaning, and truth. (Oxford:
Clarendon).
Recanati, F. (2004), Literal meaning. (U. K. Cambridge University Press).
Recanati, F. (2006), "Crazy Minimalism". En Mind & Language, (Blackwell Publishing)
Vol. 21, No. 1.
Recanati, F. (2007), "It is raining (somewhere)". En Linguistics and Philosophy, (USA),
No. 30.
Recanati, F. (2010), "Pragmatic enrichment". Por aparecer en G. Russell & D. Graff
Fara (eds.) Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Language, (Londres).
Stanley, J. (2000), "Context and logical form" en Linguistics and philosophy, (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands).
Stanley, J y Z. Zsabó. (2000), "On quantifier domain restriction" en Mind and language. (U. K. & USA, Blackwell) Vol. 15, Num. 2 y 3,.
Travis, Ch. (1997), “Pragmatics” en Bob Hale and Crispin Wright (eds.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
Travis, Ch. (2006), “Insensitive Semantics”. En Mind & Language, Vol. 21 No. 1, Blackwell.
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
(c) Tous droits réservés Asociación de Filosofía Eikasía 2017