Keywords
economía política
agroecológico
ecofeminismo Physiocracy
Political Economy
Agroecology
Ecofeminism
How to Cite
Abstract
This text raises the analysis of physiocracy, the political economy movement directed on the rural world that emerged in France in the middle of the 18th century. For this, we have focused on the works and publications of economists, specialists in the history of economics, the history of economic thought, and political economy. The existing bibliography is too much large, particularly in the context of an article. However, in the sources analysed there are certain coincidences to which we remit Without wishing to exhaustivity, a general approach to physiocracy is presented, the first theory of technical-scientific economics itself, which includes elements and concepts that are part of the economy such as the notion of net product, freedom of trade (laissez-faire), taxation, the single tax, capital investment, the economic circuit, etc. Furthermore, some of the theoretical assumptions of physiocracy as a political economy are highlighted with respect to the agroecological and ecofeminist concerns of the present, specifically the enhancement of primary production and the agrarian economy.
References
Blaug, Mark (1985), Economic theory in retrospect. New York, Cambridge University Press [1962].
Bueno, Gustavo (1974), «Los Grundrisse de Marx y la “Filosofía del Espíritu objetivo” de Hegel», en Sistema. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, n.º4, enero, pp. 35-46.
Cartelier, Jean (2012), «Nobility and Royaume agricole: The Tableau économique as a Political Utopia», en Jean Cartelier y Gino Longhitano (eds.), Quesnay and Physiocracy: Studies and Matérials. CEP & L'Harmattan, pp.61-86.
Cartelier, Jean (1984), «De l'ambiguité du “ Tableau économique ”», en Cahiers d'économie politique, n.°9. «Hommage à Piero Sraffa. Etudes sraffaiennes. La notion de circuit dans la pensée classique. Etudes sur Marx», pp. 39-63, <https://www.persee.fr/doc/cep_0154-8344_1984_num_9_1_981>, [20/08/2023].
Charles, Loïc y Théré, Christine (2019), «The physiocratic movement: a revision», en Steven L. Kaplan and Sophus A. Reinert (eds.),The Economic Turn: Recasting Political Economy in Enlightenment Europe. UK/USA, Anthem Press, pp. 35-70.
Daire, M. Eugène (1966), «Introduction sur la doctrine des Physiocrates, des commentaires et des notices historiques», en Physiocrates : Quesnay, Dupont de Nemours, Mercier de la Rivière, L’Abbé Baudeau, Le Trosne, première partie. Osnabrück, Otto Zeller [1846], <https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5448j.pdf>, [09/03/2023].
Daly, Herman E. (1993), «Steady-State Economics: A New Paradigm», en New Literary History, vol. 24, n.º 4, autumn, «Papers from the Commonwealth Center for Literary and Cultural Change». The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 811-816.
Dupuy, Romuald (2009a), «La physiocratie et l’économie de la nature. Une contribution au développement durable», en B. Laperche, A.-C. Cretieneau y D. Uzunidis (eds.), Développement durable: pour une nouvelle économie. Bruxelles, PIE Peter Lang, pp. 49-68.
Dupuy, Romuald (2009b), «Du travail de la nature au travail dans la société chez les Physiocrates», en Cahiers d’histoire. Revue d’histoire critique, n.º 110 «Penser le travail à l'époque moderne (XVIIe-XIXe siècles)», pp. 83-98 [1984], <https://doi.org/10.4000/chrhc.1984>, [20/04/2023].
Gehrke, Christian, y Kurz, Heinz D. (1995), «Karl Marx on physiocracy», en The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2:1. Routledge, pp. 53-90.
Larrère, Catherine (2023), L’écoféminisme. Paris, La Découverte.
Larrère, Catherine (2012), «L’écoféminisme: féminisme écologique ou écologie féministe», Tracés. Revue de Sciences humaines, n.º 22, «Écologiques. Enquêtes sur les milieux humains», pp. 105-121, <https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.5454>, [19/03/2024].
Larrère, Catherine (1992), L’invention de l’économie au XVIIIe siècle. Du droit naturel à la physiocratie. Paris, PUF.
Larrère, Catherine (1973), «L'analyse physiocratique des rapports entre la ville et la campagne», en Études rurales, n.°49-50, pp. 42-68, <https://www.persee.fr/doc/rural_0014-2182_1973_num_49_1_1862>, [20/03/2024].
Le Masne, Pierre; Dupuy, Romual y Roman, Philippe (2020), «From the accounts of Philosophie rurale to the physiocratic Tableau: François Quesnay as a precursor of national accounting», en Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 42, iss. 4, December. Cambridge University Press, pp. 457-481.
Le Masne, Pierre (2016), «Tableau de Quesnay et tableau de Leontief», en Cahiers d'économie politique, vol. 2, n.º 71. L'Harmattan, pp. 31-64, <http://10.3917/cep.071.0031>, [30/04/2024].
Llombart, Vicent (2009), «El valor de la Fisiocracia en su propio tiempo: un análisis crítico», en Investigaciones de Historia Económica, vol. 5, n.º 15, pp. 109-136, <https://doi.org/10.1016/S1698-6989(09)70121-3>, [30/04/2024].
Markovits, Francine (ed.) (2002), Corpus. Revue de philosophie, n.º 40 : «Nature et société au XVIIIe. Dossier économie politique». Paris, Centre d’Études d’Histoire de la Philosophie Moderne et Contemporaine, <https://revuecorpus.com/som40.html>, [10/03/2023].
Marx Karl (1975), Theories of Surplus Value [Volume IV of Capital], part 1. Moscow, Progress [1863], <https://archive.org/details/marxtsvpart1/page/n5/mode/2up>, [20/03/2024]
Meek, Ronald L. (1962), The economics of physiocracy. Essays and Translations. London and New York, Routledge.
Mirabeau, Victor Riquetti marquis de; Quesnay, François y de Butré, Charles Richard (2014), Philosophie rurale ou économie général et politique de l’agriculture, réduite à l’ordre immutable des lois physiques et morales, qui assurent la prospérité des empires (Romual Dupuy et Pierre Le Masne, eds.). Genève, Slatkine Érudition.
Pisanelli, Simona (2023), «El impôt unique fisiocrático. Su recepción en España», en Cuadernos de Estudio del siglo XVIII, n.º 33, pp. 155-184, <https://doi.org/10.17811/cesxviii.33.2023.155-184>, [20/03/2024].
Poumier, Pierre (1952), «Georges Weulersse. La physiocratie sous les ministères de Turgot et de Necker (1774-1781)», en Annales. Economies, sociétés, civilisations ,7e année, n.º 1, pp. 107-111.
Quesnay, François (1767-1768), Physiocratie, ou constitution naturelle du gouvernement le plus avantageux au genre humain (Pierre-Samuel Du Pont, ed.). Leiden/Paris, Merlin.
Sabbagh, Gabriel (2015), «The Philosophie rurale of Quesnay, Mirabeau, and Butré, after 250 Years», en Contributions to Political Economy, vol. 34, iss. 1, pp. 105-124.
Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1954-2006), History of Economic Analysis. UK, Routledge.
Théré ,Christine y Charles, Loïc (2017), «Physiocracy, Enlightenment and the Gender issue», en 21st Annual Conference of the European Society for the History of Economic Thought: Rationality in economics.
Théré ,Christine y Charles, Loïc (2008), «The Writing Workshop of François Quesnay and the Making of Phisiocracy», en History of Political Economy, vol. 40, is. 1, pp. 1-41.
Théré ,Christine y Charles, Loïc (2007), «Francois Quesnay: A "Rural Socrates" in Versailles?», en History of Political Economy, 39 (annual suppl.), pp. 195-213.
Vaggi, Gianni (1987), The economics of François Quesnay. London, Macmillan Press.
Viñas Martín, Ángel (1974), «El Tableau de Quesnay como instrumento de análisis económico», en Revista de Economía Política, enero, pp. 165-236, <https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2495578>, [20/03/2024].
Vivien, Franck-Dominique (2002), Economía y ecología (V. Vela, trad.), 2.ª ed. Quito (Ecuador), Abya-Yala, <https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1160&context=abya_yala>, [30/04/2024].
Weulersse, Georges (1969), Le mouvement physiocratique en France (de 1756 à 1770), 2.ª ed. Paris, Alcan, Wentworth Press [1910], 2 t.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.