Abstract
New excursus of the Leibnizian problem of indiscernibilia in a quantum context. The symmetry by exchange of the quantum mechanical wave function emerges as a relational property of disposition that frames the question in the epistemological field. The essay proposes a dual solution for identity in monadic and noumenal universes, on the metaphysical hypotheses of an absolute or substantive space-time.
References
Barnette, R. L. (1978), «Does Quantum Mechanics Disprove The Principle of The Identity of Indiscernibles?», en Philosophy of Science, 45 (3), pp. 466-470.
Black, Max (1952), «The Identity of Indiscernibles», en Mind. A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, 61 (242), pp. 153-164.
Burtt, Edwin A. (1960), Los fundamentos metafísicos de la ciencia moderna. Buenos Aires, Sudamericana.
Cohen, Bernard I. (1989), El nacimiento de una nueva física. Madrid, Alianza.
Cortes, Alberto (1976), «Leibniz's Principle of The Identity of Indiscernibles: A False Principle», en Philosophy of Science, 43, pp. 491-505.
Dieks, D. y Veerstegh, M. (2008), «Identical Quantum Particles and Weak Discernibility», en Foundations of Physics, 38 (10), pp. 923-934.
Einstein, Albert (1924), «Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases», en Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (Berlin), Physikalisch-mathematische Klasse. Berlin, pp. 261-267.
Friebe, Cord (2014), «Individuality, distinguishability, and (non-)entanglement: A Defense of Leibniz׳s Principle» en Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 48, pp. 89-98.
Godwin, William (1982), «Analysis and the Identity of Indiscernibles», en Analysis, 42/2, pp. 80-82.
Grelling, Kurt (1936), «Identitas indiscernibilium», en Erkenntnis, 6, pp. 252-259.
Hacking, Ian (1975), «The Identity of Indiscernibles», en The Journal of Philosophy, 72/9, pp. 249-256.
Hawley K. (2009), «Identity and indiscernibility», en Mind, 118 (1), pp. 101-119.
Keene, Geoffrey B. (1956), «Note on the Identity of Indiscernibles», en Mind, 65 (258), pp. 252-254.
Kielkopf, Charles F. (1978), «Duns Scotus's Rejection of 'Necessarily Exists' as a Predicate», en Journal of History of Philosophy, 16 (1), pp. 13-21.
Knuuttila, Simo (1981), «Time and Modality in Scholasticism», en Reforging the Great Chain of Being. Studies of the History of Modal Theories. Dordrecht-Boston, Reidel.
Langford, C. H. (1930), «Otherness and Dissimilarity», en Mind, 39, pp. 454-461.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm (1942), Discurso de metafísica. Madrid, Revista de Occidente.
Messiah, Albert (1999), Quantum Mechanics. New York, Dover Publications.
O'Leary-Hawthorne, John (1995), «The Bundle Theory of Substance and the Identity of Indiscernibles», en Analysis, 55/3, pp. 191-196.
O'Connor, David J. (1954), «The Identity of Indiscernibles», en Analysis, 14/5, pp. 103-110.
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1933), Collected Papers (Charles Hartshorne y Paul Weiss, eds.). Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Russell, Bertrand (1977), Exposición crítica de la filosofía de Leibniz. Buenos Aires, Siglo XX.
Vaihinger, Hans (1922), «Anhang - Das Paradoxonder symmetrischen Gegenstände», en Kommentarzur Kant's Krtik der reinen Vernunft, vol. II, pp. 518-532. El pasaje de Kant pertenece a KrV, B 319-320.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (2016), Tratado lógico-filosófico (Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung). Valencia, Tirant lo Blanch.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1997), «Extraits de lettres de Wittgenstein à Russell, 1912-1920» (Apéndice III), en Carnets 1914-1916. Paris, Gallimard.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Eikasía Revista de Filosofía