Critic and constructive horizons in Luce Irigaray’s thinking: Notes for an interpretation of Speculum: de l’autre femme
Cartel del VII Congreso de la SAF. Imagen cedida por Natalia Pastor
pdf (Español (España))

Keywords

Luce Irigaray
Speculum
traducción
diferencia sexuada
speculum mundi
derrocamiento Luce Irigaray
Speculum
Traduction
Sexuate Difference
Speculum Mundi
Overthrow

How to Cite

Ugalde Guajardo, A. (2023). Critic and constructive horizons in Luce Irigaray’s thinking: Notes for an interpretation of Speculum: de l’autre femme. Eikasía Revista De Filosofía, (114), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.114.585

Abstract

The publication of Speculum: de l'autre femme in 1974, by the philosopher, Luce Irigaray, produced an unusual stir, expressed in how the work was received and in the author's trajectory. Its resonances, still present today, are related to the forcefulness of her critical spirit, the playful and at times hermetic style of her writing, and the philosophical depth of the interlocutors Irigaray summons to appear in this unusual scene of scriptural experimentation.

The author has pointed out that her trajectory of thought responds to the dynamics of critical and constructive elements. If we follow this reading key, Speculum can be read as an exercise of thought that takes place in the background of a tension between, on the one hand, critical interventions to the Western philosophical canon and psychoanalytic discourse, and on the other, the need to think about the conditions for transforming an entire culture. In what follows, I would like to explore this reading key, proposing some conceptual tools.

https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.114.585
pdf (Español (España))

References

Boulard, Stéphanie; Gueorguieva, E.; Samoyault, T.; y Ruffel, L. (2019), «L’Invention de Vincennes en trois épisodes», en Contemporary French and Francophone Studies, vol. 23, n.º 2, pp. 225-242, <https://doi.org/10.1080/17409292.2019.1674489> [15/05/2022].

Castillo, Alejandra (2017), Simone de Beauvoir. Filósofa, antifilósofa. Santiago, La Cebra.

Dossé, François (2018), La saga des intellectuels français, II. L' avenir en miettes 1968-1989. Paris, Gallimard.

Grosz, Elizabeth, e Irigaray, Luce (2008), «Sexuate Identities as Global Beings. Conversations between Luce Irigaray and Elizabeth Grosz», en L. Irigaray, Conversations. London, Continuum, pp. 124-138.

Hirsh, E.; Olson, G. A.; y Brulotte, G. (1996), «“Je—Luce Irigaray”: A Meeting with Luce Irigaray», en JAC, vol. 16, n.º 3, pp. 341-361.

Irigaray, Luce (1994), Amo a ti. Verdaguer, Icaria.

Irigaray, Luce, y Garnier, Marie-Dominique (2020), «Étrangère à quoi ? Ou à qui ?», en Chimères, N.º 96, 21-35.

Jones, Emma Red (2011), Speaking at the Limit: The Ontology of Luce Irigaray's Ethics, in Dialogue With Lacan and Heidegger. Thesis. Oregon, <http://hdl.handle.net/1794/11542> [09/05/2022].

Marini, Marcelle (1989), Lacan: itinerario de su obra. Buenos Aires, Nueva Visión.

Mathieu, Lilian (2018), «Virginie Linhart, Vincennes, l’université perdue», en Lectures. <http://journals.openedition.org/lectures/24616> [15/05/2022].

Mulder, Anne-Caire (2006), Divine Flesh, Embodied Word. Incarnation as a Hermeneutical Key to a Feminist Theologian's Reading of Luce Irigaray's Work. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam.

Nùnes, Eric. (2017), «Vincennes et Dauphine, sans entraves», en Le Monde Diplomatique, 4 de agosto, <https://www.lemonde.fr/campus/article/2017/08/04/vincennes-et-dauphine-sans-entraves_5168863_4401467.html> [15/05/2022].

Paul-Droit, Roger, e Irigaray, L. (1985), «Luce Irigaray et la différence des sexes», en Le Monde Diplomatique, 7 de junio, <https://www.lemonde.fr/archives/article/1985/06/07/luce-irigaray-et-la-difference-des-sexes_2755498_1819218.html> [15/05/2022].

Piñero H., Aránzazu (4 de marzo de 2019), «Luce Irigaray» en Filosofía ULL, 4 de marzo, <https://filosofiaull.blogspot.com/2019/03/4-de-marzo-luce-irigaray-aranzazu.html>, [23/05/2020].

Roberts, Laura (2019), Irigaray and Politics : a Critical Introduction. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

Söderbäck, Fanny (2019), Revolutionary Time. On time and difference in Kristeva and Irigaray. New York, Sunny Press.

Torres, Milagros. L. (2011), «Especularización e imaginario en Speculum: psicoanálisis y representación de la diferencia en la tradición teórica (masculina)», en Isabel Vázquez Bermúdez (coord.), Investigación y género, logros y retos: III Congreso Universitario Nacional Investigación y Género, [libro de actas]. Facultad de Ciencias del Trabajo de la Universidad de Sevilla, 16 y 17 de junio de 2011. Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, pp. 1102-1116. <https://idus.us.es/handle/11441/39604> [25/03/2020]

Ugalde, Andrea (2022), «La contienda sin fin: paradojas del feminismo y gramática(s) de la enunciación», en Disenso. Revista de pensamiento político, n.º 4, 90-107.

Whitford, M. (1986), «Luce Irigaray and the Female Imaginary: Speaking as a Woman», en Radical Philosophy, (7): 3 (43), <https://www.radicalphilosophy.com/article/lucy-irigaray-and-the-female-imaginary> [25/06/2022].

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.