Abstract
The purpose of this writing is to make a revision over the consequents and controversies that human genome description raised. For this finality, one will refer to three perspectives or disciplines that have a great importance in this matter: Genetics of the Conduct, Genetics Determinism and Sociobiology in the search of a conclusion that determines if human practice is a product of a genetic inheritance, a product of a social environ or a result from combination of both of them.
References
Abrisqueta, José A. (2001), «Perspectivas actuales de la genética humana» (CSIC, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas).
Bonilla Suárez, Uriel; González Penalva, Carlos; Infiesta Molleda, Pablo J y Pérez Bacigalupe, Diego (s. f.), Sociobiología e ideología (Colección Cortinas de Humo, 1).
Conrad, P. (2007), The medicalization of society. On the transformation of human conditions into treatable disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1977), El hombre preprogramado. Madrid, Alianza.
Harris, Marvin (2004), Introducción a la antropología general, 7.ª ed. Madrid, Alianza.
Lewontin, R. C.; Rose, St. y Kamin, L. (1997), No está en los genes. Barcelona, Crítica.
Plomin, R.; Defries, J. C.; McClearn, G. E. y McGuffin, P. (2009), Genética de la conducta, 2.ª ed. Barcelona, Ariel.
Wilson, Edward (1980), Sobre la naturaleza humana. México, FCE.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.