Abstract
The aim is to show that attempts to access psychiatric experience and determine it from naturalistic and psychologist positions, which are the dominant ones, entail instability and that this precisely characterizes the field of psychiatry historically. Assuming the philosophical implications of approaching this open empirical field, it is postulated that only psychopathology, in its exercise as a procedure that is both logical and intellectual, makes it possible to relate the different planes of reality in which it unfolds and to try to close its field to provide psychiatry with the necessary stability required for its clinical practice.![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Eikasía S.L.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.