Abstract
Kant criticized the moral philosophy of Aristotle for two reasons: on the empirical application of the golden mean principle and the application of the eudaimonia principle. The article is divided into four sections. First, it shows the elements of Kant'ʹs practical philosophy. Second, it shows the elements of the Kantian criticism. Third, it explains the place of principles in Aristotle ́s moral theory. Finally, we defend the thesis that Kant'ʹs critique is relatively unsatisfactory.
References
Annas, Julia (1993) The Morality of Happiness. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aristóteles (2002), Ética a Nicómaco, Centro de estudios políticos y constitucionales, Madrid.
Aubenque, Pierre (1993), La prudence chez Aristote. Avec un appendice sur la prudence chez Kant, Presses
Universitaires de France, París.
Chiereghin, Franco (1995), Teleologia e idea della vita tra Aristotele e Kant, Trento, Verifiche.
Donini, Pier (1989), Ethos e il determinismo, Edizioni dell ́orso, Alessandria.
Engstrom (1998) Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1998.
Filippi, Silvana (1989) “El conocimiento en Kant. Confrontaciones con Aristóteles”, en Estudios filosóficos, n.
, pp. 63-99,
Filipi, Silvana (1992), “Karl Otto Opel: kantismo e interpretación de la ética aristotélica”, en Filosofia Oggi,
Genova, n. 1, pp. 69-106.
Kant, I (2005) Crítica de la razón práctica, FCE, México, 2005.
(2010) Crítica de la razón pura, Taurus, Madrid, 2010.
(2005) La metafísica de las costumbres, Tecnos, Madrid, 2005.
Macor, Laura (2011) La fragilità della virtù: dall ́antropologia alla morale e ritorno nell ́epoca di Kant, Mimesis,
Milano, 2011.
Murphy, James (2001) “Practical reason and moral psychology in Aristotle and Kant”, en Social Philosophy and
Policy, Oxford, n. 2, pp. 257-299.
Pleines, Jürgen- Eckardt (1984) Eudaimonia zwischen Kant und Aristoteles: Glückseligkeit als höchstes Gut menschlichen Handelns, Würzburg, Königshausen and Neumann.
Railton, Peter: (2001) “Kant rencontre Aristote ou la raison rencontre l’appetit”, en Philosophiques, n.1, pp. 47-67. Regvald, Richard (1990) “La noétique kantienne et ses sources aristotéliciennes”, en Les Étudies Philosophiques, n. 2, pp. 206-216.
Rovira, Rogelio (1992) “Las divisiones de la filosofía práctica de Kant”, en Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, n. 9, Madrid, 1992, pp. 79-87.
(2002) “¿Una sabiduría insulsa? Sobre la crítica de Kant al principio de la mésotes”, en Isegoría, no. 27, 2002, pp.239-249.
Schroeter, Francois (1992) La critique kantianne de l’ eudémonisme, Berlin, Main Lang.
Sherman, Nancy (1997) Making a Necessity of Virtue: Aristotle and Kant On Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tafani, Daniela (2006) Virtú e felicità in Kant, Olscki, Firenze.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.