Wittgenstein et l'infini
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Wittgenstein
mathematics
logic
infinity Wittgenstein
mathématique
logique
infini

How to Cite

Warkocki, W. . (2026). Wittgenstein et l’infini: Le dépassement de la métaphysique par l’analyse langagière de la logique. Eikasía Revista De Filosofía, (72), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.72.2590

Abstract

Our principal goal in the article is to highlight the relation of Ludwig Wittgenstein (in the period of Philosophical Investigations) with what he calls metaphysics. His strategy of overcoming (Überwindung) is quite different from the one undertaken by the Vienna Circle. The second Wittgenstein develops an original philosophy which, being considerably different from the Tractatus, remains in continuity with his first philosophy. The aim is no more the logical analysis of language that strives to create an ideal logical calculus, but a kind of parsing of our linguistic habits, including the mathematical logic. The latter with the concept of infinity that haunted the research of the foundations of mathematics during the first half of the twentieth century, will be the subject of our investigation. Wittgenstein continues to reflect on the philosophy of mathematics because it reveals the philosophical problems in all their acuity. Nowadays, in our opinion, there is no another place where Platonism with all its problematical diversity is still seriously at stake. In other words, there is no another intellectual domain where we can still feel the old taste for metaphysics. This is one of the main reasons why Wittgenstein devoted half of his notes from his second philosophy to the problems of mathematics and mathematical logic: the Platonism inherent to the mathematical logic fools us with a "infinity of shadowy worlds."

https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.72.2590
PDF (Español (España))

References

Carnap, Rudolf, «Le dépassement de la métaphysique par l'analyse logique du langage», in J. Laurent, C. Romano, Le Néant. Contribution à l'histoire du non-être dans la philosophie occidentale, pp. 535-560.

Dauben, J.W., «The Battle for Cantorian Set Theory», in Kinyon, Michael and van Brummelen, Glen (ed.), Mathematics and the Historian’s Craft : the Kenneth O. May Lectures, New York, Springer, 2005, pp. 221-241

Ferreirós, J., «The Motives behind Cantor's Set Theory – Physical, Biological, and Philosophical Questions», in Science in Context, n° 17, 2004, pp. 1-35.

Hilbert, Divid, "On the Infinite", in P. Benacerraf, H. Putnam (ed.) Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Readings, London-New York, Cambridge University Press, 1983, pp.183-201.

Husserl, Edmund, Ideen I, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1976. Kanamori, A., «The Mathematical Development of Set Theory from Cantor to Cohen», in The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 2, 1996, p. 1-71.

Marion, Mathieu, Wittgenstein, Finitism and the Foundation of Mathematics, New York, Oxford University Press, 1998. Monk, Ray, The Duty of Genius, New York, Penguin Books, 1991.

Moore, A.W., The Infinite, London - New York, Routledge, 2001. Priest, Graham, «Wittgenstein's Remarks on Gödel's Theorem», in M. Kolbel, B. Weiss (ed.), Wittgenstein's Lasting Significance, London-New York,

Routledge, 2004, pp. 207227. Richir, Marc, «Une antinomie quasi-kantienne dans la fondation cantorienne de la théorie des ensembles», in Études phénoménologiques n°3 : Phénoménologie et sciences exactes,

Ousia, Bruxelles, 1986, pp.83-115. Rodych, Victor, «Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Mathematics», in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wittgenstein-mathematics/ Russell, Bertrand, Our Knowledge of External World, London, George Allen & Unwin Ltd Ruskin House, 1914.

Tengelyi, László, «Experience and Infinity in Kant and Husserl», in Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, n° 68, 2005, pp.479-500.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Eikasia Filosofía

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.