Abstract
The answer of Heidegger to Sartre's
existentialism is written on a letter to Beufret,
a disciple of the german thinker, in which
Sartre's thought is dismissed as a vulgar
humanism. This letter is not only the
deployment of a specific problem between two
authors, but it is also, the cornerstone of the anti-humanist basis. The same text, taken in the late twenty-first century by Sloterdijk, revives the problem of the human in Heidegger, to give it a political transcript in which humanism ends by becoming a device of cultural inhibition necessary for civilization.
References
Deleuze, G. (2002) Diferencia y Repetición, Buenos Aires: Amorrotu.
Duque, F. (2006), En torno al humanismo: Heidegger, Gadamer, Sloterdijk, Tecnos, Madrid:
Tecnos.
Sloterdijk, P. (2011a), El hombre operable. Recuperado de:
http://www.otrocampo.com/3/sloterdijk.html.
Sloterdijk, P. (2011b), Reglas para el parque humano (una propuesta de la carta sobre el
humanismo)” en Sin salvación, Madrid: Akal, p. 197.
Heidegger, M. (2000), Carta Sobre el Humanismo en Hitos, Madrid: Alianza Ed.
Heidegger, M. (2009), Ser y Tiempo. Madrid: Trotta, 2009. , trad. Jorge Eduardo Rivera.
Molinuevo, J.L (2004). Humanismo y nuevas tecnologías, Madrid: Alianza Ed.
Pöggeler, O. (1993) El camino del pensar de Martin Heidegger, Madrid: Alianza
Vásquez Rocca, A. (2009), “Sloterdijk, Habermas y Heidegger; Humanismo, Posthumanismo y debate en torno al Parque Humano”, Eikasia. Revista de Filosofía, nº26, pp. 1-22.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2015 Asociación de Filosofía Eikasía
