Abstract
We start from the question of how significant are the
differences between the philosophies of Gilles Deleuze and
Maurice Merleau-‐‑Ponty. Rather than emphasizing the
similarities or dissimilarities between the two, we argue that
between these thinkers there is a kind of "ʺrelay"ʺ, in which
Merleau-‐‑Ponty anticipates in his last writings certain
possible developments of philosophical thought, some of
which become actual in Deleuze'ʹs work (without ignoring,
of course, the specific contexts in which their respective
ideas arise). We will pay special attention to themes shared
by these thinkers, such as their assessment of structuralism,
their critique and transcendence of the "ʺphilosophy of
conscience"ʺ (reflexive subjectivism), and their openness to
an ontology of immanence, concrete and dynamic, centered
on the notion of "ʺlife"ʺ (in the manner of Bergson) rather than
on the notion of "ʺBeing"ʺ (in the manner of Heidegger).
References
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Notes de cours. 1959-1961, Paris, Gallimard, 1996, p. 275.
Gilles Deleuze, “La inmanencia: una vida”, Op. cit., p. 348.
Alain Badiou, “De la vie comme nom de l’Être”, en: Rue Descartes. Collège International de Philosophie, Gilles Deleuze. Immanence et
vie, París, Press Universitarires de France, 1998, pp. 27-34. Ver también de A. Badiou, Deleuze. ‘El clamor del ser’, tr. Dardo Scavino, Buenos
Aires, Manantial, 1997.
Gilles Deleuze, El bergsonismo, tr. Luis Ferrero, Madrid, Cátedra, 1987.
Cf. Gilles Deleuze y Félix Guattari, Mil mesetas, op. cit. Ver el apartado “28 de noviembre 1947 – ¿Cómo hacerse un cuerpo sin órganos?”,
pp. 155-173.
Judith Michalet, “La chair comme ‘plissement du dehors’. La lecture deleuzienne du dernier Merleau-Ponty”, Chiasmi international, 13, p.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2013 Asociación de Filosofía Eikasia
