Abstract
This paper explores how epistemic artifacts have transformed our understanding of scientific observation. It examines the historical evolution from basic instruments such as Mayan quadrants and Galileo’s telescope to today’s sophisticated electron microscopes. The study focuses on how these devices have reshaped the traditional concept of observation in the philosophy of science, particularly within the field of nanotechnology. Against the backdrop of historical figures such as Descartes, Hooke, Newton, and Leeuwenhoek, it highlights how each contributed to the development of the «microscopic artifactual tradition». The paper introduces the concept of nanoepistemology to describe how knowledge of the nano-world fundamentally depends on instrument-processed images rather than traditional direct observation. It concludes that these technological transformations have weakened the role of classical theories and have shifted the philosophy of science toward a philosophy of technology.
References
Birkeland, R. S. (2009). How to Understand Nano Images. Techné, 182-189.
Descartes, R. (1987). Discurso del método, Dióptrica, Meteoros y Geometría. Madrid: Alfaguara.
Hooke, R. (1989). Micrografía. Madrid: Edicioes Alfaguara.
Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Newton, I. (1977). Óptica o tratado de las reflexiones refracciones inflexiones y colores de la luz. Madrid: Ediciones Alfaguara.
Pitt, J. C. (2004 ). The Epistemology of the Very Small. En A. N. D. Baird, Discovering the Nanoscale, (págs. 157-163). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Snyder, J. L. (2017). El ojo del observador. Johannes Vermeer, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek y la reinvencion de la mirada. Barcelona: Acantilado.
Toulmin, S. (1964). La filosofía de la ciencia. Buenos Aires: Los libros del mirasol.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
